G Zhang GongAI Search Visibility · GEO / GSO
For B2B manufacturers, industrial suppliers & local service firms

Your buyers now ask AI first. Be the answer, not another link.

Doubao, DeepSeek, Kimi and ChatGPT now answer "which supplier should I choose?" with a written recommendation. If your company isn't in that answer, you don't exist in that market — no matter how good your website looks.

Practical, measurable work — llms.txt, structured data, comparison content, third-party listings, and monitoring that proves whether AI actually recommends you.

3亿+Monthly active users across Doubao, DeepSeek, Tongyi and Kimi
<5%Of Chinese SMEs currently optimise for AI search
4 stepsNAP fact sheet → llms.txt + JSON-LD → platform listings → monitoring
2–3 moTypical time to measurable AI citation growth
How it works

GEO is not a ranking trick. It is making AI trust you enough to quote you.

Traditional SEO chases positions in a results list. GEO chases inclusion in a generated answer. Different mechanics, different checklist, and a deeper moat once you are in the model's source pool.

1

Structured data (the entry ticket)

Schema.org JSON-LD in the <head>: LocalBusiness, Service, FAQPage, Product. This is how a machine confirms your company is a real, addressable entity.

  • Most top-tier manufacturers have none — verified in live audits
  • Machine-readable name, address, phone, service area
2

llms.txt — a content map for AI

A plain-text file at your root that tells AI which pages are worth citing: company profile, product pages, cases, FAQ, contact. Cheap to build, and a visible differentiator versus competitors.

  • Chinese peers in adjacent verticals already ship it
  • Global incumbents have not — verified across PFA, PVDF, UPVC suppliers
3

Comparison-grade content

AI harvests lists, tables and cited sources. Specs and parameters must be rendered as real HTML <table> elements — not images, not canvas, not <div> soup.

  • Selection guides and spec comparison tables
  • Standard interpretations and vendor comparisons
4

FAQ pages in question form

Headings written as the exact questions buyers ask, answered with specifics — numbers, tolerances, certifications, lead times. No marketing filler.

  • "PFA vs PVDF for semiconductor use — how do I choose?"
  • "Is UPVC safe for ultrapure water?"
5

NAP consistency across platforms

Name, address and phone must be byte-identical on your site, maps, review platforms and business registries — or AI reads two different companies.

  • Maps, review sites, Q&A platforms, industry directories
  • One single source-of-truth fact sheet
6

Third-party authority & entity proof

AI judges authority from outside signals: industry memberships, trade press, association listings, consistent recent activity.

  • Real reviews and citations matter more than self-claimed superlatives
  • Entities are built, not asserted
DimensionTraditional SEOGEO / GSO
Optimised forBaidu, Google results pagesDoubao, DeepSeek, Tongyi, Kimi, ChatGPT
Ranking logicKeyword density, backlinks, page authorityAuthority, structured data, content quality, citation frequency
Result formatA list of linksA generated, complete answer
User behaviourUser clicks a linkUser gets the answer — may never click
Conversion pathSearch → click → landing page → enquiryQuestion → answer → direct contact (may skip your site)
What winsPage-level optimisationEntity-level authority + machine readability
Proof

An audit that showed exactly where the AI-visibility gap is

Live audits of the high-purity fluoropolymer piping industry (semiconductor and photovoltaic grade) — the category where international incumbents dominate buyer awareness.

What the search data actually showed

Twelve bilingual query sets run across high-purity piping categories. The finding was not "your site is ugly" — it was that your company had a name but no authoritative profile in the sources AI crawls.

  • Incumbents (Entegris, Saint-Gobain, GF, Asahi, Nippon Pillar, Parker, Zeus) own the category recall for PFA / PVDF / fluoropolymer piping questions.
  • Domestic Chinese factories were mostly visible only as fragmented listings on B2B yellow pages — no independent strong site, so AI treats them as unverified.
  • In the photovoltaic and high-purity UPVC segment, the international players were completely absent — a genuine blue ocean.
  • Chinese-language "photovoltaic-grade UPVC fittings" queries were semantically hijacked by solar conduit / electrical pipe products — a different category entirely. Correct terminology (high-purity UPVC, CLEAN PVC) meant almost no competition.
  • Not one leading player in the category shipped llms.txt; several actively block AI crawlers.
12 bilingual query sets 4 pipe categories Incumbent vs domestic comparison Category-gap mapping
Audit dimensionFinding
llms.txtAbsent across the whole category
JSON-LDNot detected on leading supplier sites
English FAQ schemaMissing — buying questions unanswered
Spec tablesImages / fragments, not HTML tables
Crawler policySome majors block AI crawlers outright
Blue oceanHigh-purity UPVC / solar / ultrapure water
Semantics trapChinese query terms route to wrong product

What gets built, in priority order

  • P0 — real HTML spec/parameter/comparison tables, llms.txt, JSON-LD on home, product and FAQ pages
  • P1 — cited comparison content, English FAQ with FAQPage schema, entity/authority page (year, capacity, certifications, export markets)
  • P2 — multi-language with hreflang, trade-press citations, industry memberships, steady publishing cadence

Why incumbents lose here

Market-report pages are the highest-cited sources for "who makes this" questions. Building a comparison-grade page with the same structure — list, table, cited sources — puts you into that source pool. None of this requires a large team; it requires knowing what AI actually reads.

How progress is measured

Weekly checks of real buyer prompts against Doubao, DeepSeek, Tongyi and Kimi: "Beijing waterproofing company, which is good?", "semiconductor grade PFA tubing supplier China”. We log mentions, context and position — then fix the content that was not quoted.

Pricing

Clear packages. No lock-in to a platform that is not yours.

You own the domain, the code and the content. I do the GEO layer on top of your existing site, or build the site if you do not have one.

Foundation

¥6,000 one-off

For firms with an existing website that AI cannot read.

  • Single landing page, mobile-first
  • llms.txt + JSON-LD structured data
  • NAP fact sheet + platform listing setup
  • One month of monitoring
Most common

AI-Readable Site

¥68,000 typical

For exporters and manufacturers who need to win English-language AI searches.

  • Full bilingual site (EN primary, ZH secondary)
  • HTML-rendered spec & comparison tables
  • English FAQ with FAQPage schema
  • hreflang, sitemap, performance tuning
  • Third-party listings & first citations

Maintenance

¥3,000–6,000 / year

Keep the visibility you earned.

  • Monthly AI mention monitoring
  • Content refresh, new comparison pages
  • Platform listing upkeep
  • POC period available, settle on data
Note on scope: final scope and quote are agreed one-to-one. Recommendations, certifications and conclusions are made by appropriately qualified people; nothing on this site constitutes professional advice.
FAQ

Questions I get asked before the first project

How is GEO different from SEO — and do I need both?

They are complementary, not alternatives. The technical overlap is large (quality content, structured data, mobile performance), but GEO adds machine readability and entity authority. A site can rank well on Baidu and still never be quoted by an AI assistant, because the assistant evaluates authority and structure differently. If you can only fund one, do both at the technical layer first.

Do I need a technical team to do GEO?

No, for the foundation. Adding LocalBusiness JSON-LD, writing an llms.txt and creating an FAQ page can be done through your CMS or by hand — no code required. Advanced work (custom schema types, large-scale multi-language export sites, crawler diagnostics) does need technical help.

How long before AI assistants actually mention my company?

GEO is a compounding project, not a toggle. Expect the first movement in 4–8 weeks as your structured data and FAQ pages get picked up, and clearer citation growth over 2–3 months. Once you are in the model's source pool, the effect accumulates — that is where the moat is versus classic SEO.

Will AI recommend my company instead of a bigger competitor?

It depends on whether you are a credible entity in the sources AI reads. In many niches — especially high-purity industrial supply, specialist trades, regional services — the international or national leaders have not done this work, and the smaller specialist wins. That is the specific opportunity I look for in the audit phase: where the incumbents are absent.

Do you work outside Beijing?

Yes. I am based in Beijing and work with clients across China, including export-facing manufacturers whose buyer journey runs through English-language AI tools. The first audit and the content work are done remotely; on-site visits are arranged for Beijing clients at no extra charge.

What do you need from me to start?

A single NAP fact sheet: registered company name, full address, phone, domain, core services (3–5), one-line positioning for customers and AI, and any certifications. If you already have a website, point me at it. I run the audit first, then we talk scope.

Free gap check

Find out whether AI currently recommends you — before you spend anything

Tell me your company and the questions your buyers ask. I run a real audit of how your brand appears across Doubao, DeepSeek, Tongyi and Kimi, and send you the gap list. Free, no obligation.

Send the request

Or email jw.zhang@163.com directly. I reply within one working day.

  • Emailjw.zhang@163.com
  • Phone / WeChat+86 180 0113 7251
  • Based inBeijing, China — working with clients nationwide
  • LanguagesEnglish & Chinese (English-facing projects preferred)
  • Working hoursMonday to Friday, 09:00–19:00 (GMT+8)
What the free gap check includes: your brand name tested against real buyer prompts in AI assistants, a review of whether your site is machine-readable (structured data, llms.txt, FAQ, spec tables), and a ranked list of the gaps worth fixing first.

What I am not

Not an agency with a content farm, and not a tool that submits your site to a hundred directories. The work is: make your existing authority machine-readable, prove it with citations, and keep it alive.